Help
Sign In
aqal
August 2008 
Integral Software Development
MrTeacup
This diagram seems awfully familiar...
For those unfamiliar with software engineering, this is the 4+1 architectural view model from the Rational Unified Process which is a set of guidelines, models and structures for software development. Does it map on to the AQAL model? Unless I'm mistaken, its a perfect match.
The AQAL model is split vertically between Interior and Exterior, which RUP4+1 represents as Conceptual and Physical. AQAL is split horizontally between Individual and Collective, which is not labeled in 4+1, but I think its reasonable to say that there's a match there too. The Logical View and Implementation View refer to the meaning of a software component and its actual physical construction. The Process View refers to the interaction between software components, and the Deployment View refers to the environment in which they interact and are linked together.
Update: A tiny problem with this diagram - it has programmers in the UR quadrant when, for the most part, they are in the UL quadrant. Unless you are actually writing in assembly, you are dealing with the interior, or logical perspective of the software.
Access: Public
now that looks hawt! so does the end-user/use-case view maps to the Witness? :)
I'm not so clear on that one, but I can think of a few similarities. The end-user is the beginning and the end of the software process, so there's a sense in which the customer has a causal relationship with the process, and also of course, is the final user of the software in its intended form. In UML, the end user is called the Actor. This reminds me of something I first heard from Alan Watts, that Hindu cosmology views the universe as a drama, which Buddhism also inherited to some degree.
Also, the Actor plays a role throughout the process, but the real nature of the Actor is completely outside the scope of the system. Software engineering models can't capture and model the complex psychology of a real human being.